Forensic spraakonderzoeker taptolken searches for research on sprekerherkenning

Forensic spraakonderzoeker taptolken searches for research on sprekerherkenningIt Is justified that the police me as an interpreter requests sprekerherkenning to do as proof in a criminal case?

Taptolken regularly receive the question of the police to voice recognition to do for obtaining evidence against a suspect. On this subject includes taptolken much discussion. Interpreters are not trained as stemherkenners. On the other hand hear interpreters of course very many phone calls, and they are perhaps often good in the recognition of the speakers. Only: how sure you know if taptolk that you do well? This Is a responsibility that you can handle it and you want to contribute? After all, it is used as evidence against a person.

Maartje Schreuder is forensic spraakonderzoeker to the Maastricht University. She is currently a scientific study by taptolken speech recognition. For its investigation, they are still looking for participants. Have you experience as taptolk and would like to answer the question yourself or it is justified that you sprekerherkenning does?

Read more...


Powered by CrossLang

Author: Dries Debackere

Machine translation: SDL Machine Translation (previously SDL BeGlobal)

Post-editing: No post-editing

Source language: Nederlands (nl)


Additional information